Selection
of political revendication
Individuals
are different problems and different revendication. Usually, each of us have some political rededication which are of no priority
interest to others. Individuals want to be listened and usually have other interest to listen others. 2000 years ago in Israel,
a great political campaigner did not hesitate to display magic power, claiming to talk of the name of God, to succeed to have
his political claim to listen by a large audience. Nowadays, real political practices are not more democratic. A good relation
with the television makes you exist in politics… And so, journalist, TV presentator and politician maintain good relation
to support mutually their career. All those political practice are all except democratic.
Currently,
Internet is use in two modes:
-
web site and the diffusion mode,
-
email in order to exchange between two individuals.
Both mode
are inadequate to use internet toward a democratic approach of politics. Internet offers the possibility to do politics really
democratically.
Who have
to right to bring his revendication in front of the political agenda ? The King, the president, TV news journalist, Carl Zero,
the pope, the richest man of the world Warren Buffet or all of us in an equal selection process on revendication…
The only
way to avoid that some individuals is accounted how many revendication of others you read in according to your reading accounting.
www.electronicdemocracy.co.uk will propose your revendication for reading randomly
to any reader according to the number of revendication, you had previously read.
In order
to increase the chances to reach individuals interested by your revendication, you classify it in a category or add key word.
The fact to add key word will not change the number of individuals reading your political revendication. The number of readers
will be strictly according to the number of revendication you read.
For each
revendication you had read, you could reject it because the cause does not filled according to your moral rule.