Abstract: How to have the same success rate in politic world than in the business world ?This political article discuss about the participation of the political party in the panarchist system which will replace democracy.
In democracy, most of ambitious policy implemented by a newly elected
government failed. On the opposite, in the industry, the launch of a new
product or service has usually succeeded.
In order to improve the action of the government, let's analyze the
difference between the political world and the industrial world.
The first idea is that the industrial world test on prototype their new
industrial ideas and then they would launch a new product only if they are
sure of the feasibility of the new product. A new product does not need to be
accepted and understood by the whole population. If only a sufficient fraction
of the population accept it, the product can have a sufficient market and be a
commercial success. In the case of a new policy, it is necessary that the
majority of the population understand the policy.
So, in order to solve these problems, the creation of a social
laboratory will be a major improvement in a democratic country. A
social laboratory will make it possible for a political party to create one
(or several) government of a community in order to test on a small scale a
policy that they would like to apply on a large scale.
The chance of success is larger if the policy is applied to a community in a
social laboratory because:
A
political party is more at its ease in a social laboratory because the
policy will be applied to a community, which is composed of citizen
supporters of the political party, and so it will not fail due to a too
large opposition, | |
the
size of the population involve is small so it is more easy to monitor the
psychological size effect on a population, | |
the
amount of cash need to apply a policy to a small population is small
compare than the overall population than the policy will not be affected
by a budget restriction. |
Then, if the policy appears to be a failure, the cost of giving up with the
policy is smaller than if the policy has been applied to the whole country.
In case of success, the fact to have tested the policy in a social
laboratory will speed up its implementation on the scale of the country. The
civil servant of a social laboratory had acquired the competency and so they
are trained to apply the policy on a large scale. The documentation has
already been written. The computer system is already operational.
So, in this case, a social laboratory will be a fantastic tool to help the
democracy to test the new policies. This usage of coexistencialism is easier
and less risky then in the case of coexistencialism applied to the whole
country. The community will not implement the policy exclusively with the fiscal
resource of the community but also with the financial support of the political
party who is implementing the policy. In case of failure, the member of the community
will benefit of the financial help of the whole country to reverse the
policy.