The
coexistencialism is characterized by the separation of the
government structure in two levels. The first level
of government is the central government or the regulator of governments.
This level assure the task that all government are expected to assure since
the prehistoric age: security, justice, ecology and diplomacy.
Then,
the population is divided into communities. Each community has a distinct
government. A government of the community conducts specific economic and social
policies in the community. It collects taxes and imposes a monetary
system. The fact to have a distinct monetary system per community, is not
mandatory. The same monetary system can be shared between several communities. Communities have so a distinct set of rules.
The
access of private company to the consumer market
of a community can be restricted by the government of the community. The
restriction of access can be done easily if the community has a specific currency
or if all payments are done electronically. The company can employ the workforce
of the community if the company "registers in the community" and has a
part of its activities, which respects the specific accounting standard of the community. A company can be "inter-community" as well as
"inter-national". It can have branches in more than one community. In
this case, companies keep separate accounting of their activity per communities
and pay taxes accordingly.
The
government of a community has the possibility to exercise a lobby on companies in
controlling the market share of the community to the products of the company.
This lobby is useful to force company to register, pay taxes and to employ the
workforce of the community.
A new community
is created by a schism from an established community. Social schisms are a
natural and beneficial phenomenon in coexistencialism. It will be regulated by
the "coexistencialism" constitution and controls by the central
regulator.
People
can migrate from one community to another. But, the right to migration is regulated to preserve the right
of the existing member of a community. A community can implement an examination in
order to be sure that new immigrants know the moral values of the community. A community
can also ask to the immigrant to pay an entry tax in order to
be fair with existing members who had financed the success of the community by paying taxes. The right of citizenship
in a community of a member would have
a value. Citizens who wants to leave a community for another might exchange their rights of citizenchip
in an organized market against the right of citizenship of the community
where they want to immigrate into. These mechanisms will have an effect to motivate
the citizens of a community to take care of the image of their communities. Another
advantage is if a community is created during a schism, the selling right of the
citizenship to the former community will be an initial investment to finance the
creation of the new community.
The central regulator would have the role to correct excess if a community became too elitism and has the policy to attract the most valuable professionals and reject other citizens. The central regulator will correct the transfer of prosperity in putting a tax on the elitist community.
Copyright 2002
Author: Hector Archytas